Dental implant study checks if High-Tech guidance pays off in the long run

NCT ID NCT07373548

Completed Disease control Sponsor: SmileDent Kft. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study followed 96 people who got dental implants to see if using surgical guidance (like 3D planning) leads to better long-term outcomes than freehand placement. Researchers checked implant survival, bone levels, and complications up to 67 months later. The goal is to find out if the extra precision from guidance helps implants last longer and stay healthier.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: dental implant placement (procedure)
What this could lead to: If successful, this could confirm that guided implant placement improves long-term survival and reduces complications, leading to better dental restoration practices.
What could go wrong: This is a follow-up of a completed trial, so results are observational and may not show significant differences between groups. Small sample size and specific eligibility limit generalizability.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DENTAL IMPLANT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

DENTAL IMPLANT EDENTULISM NAVIGATION

Contacts and locations

Locations

Smile Dent

Szeged, Csongrád megye, 6724, Hungary

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.