STrategies of scheduled drug-coated balloons (DCB) versus conventional DES for the interveNTional therapy of de novo lesions in large coronary vESSels (STENTLESS) trial
NCT ID NCT06084000
First seen Sep 10, 2026 · Last updated Sep 10, 2026
Summary
This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study meant to compare the safety and efficacy of scheduled drug-coated balloon (DCB) and conventional drug-eluting stent (DES) strategy in the treatment of de novo lesions of large coronary vessel with diameter larger than 2.75 mm. The trial was designed to provide high-quality evidence for expanding the clinical indications of DCB, and to explore a better way for coronary intervention based on DCB.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 2,700 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Oct 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Feb 2031
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years * De novo lesions of large coronary vessels with the diameter of target lesion reference vessel ≥ 2.75 mm * Single- or multi-vessel disease with only 1 lesion meeting the definition of severe stenosis and anatomically amenable to coronary revascularization using DCB alone judged by physician. * Severe stenosis is defined if 1 of the following criteria are met: 1. visual angiographic stenosis with severity \>= 70%. 2. functional stenosis with quantitative flow reserve (QFR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) \< 0.8. * The prospective subject is agreed on participating the study with a formal written consent Exclusion Criteria: * Acute myocardial infarction\* (STEMI or NSTEMI) within the past one month * Diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) requires both clinical evidence of myocardial ischemia and elevation of cardiac Troponin (cTn) I or T values with at least 1 value above the 99th percentile upper normal range limit (URL) * Clinical evidence of myocardial ischemia is defined as 1 of the following: 1. Symptoms of myocardial ischemia 2. New ischemic ECG changes 3. Development of pathological Q waves 4. Imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality in a pattern consistent with an ischemic etiology 5. Identification of a coronary thrombus by angiography * Type 1 MI defined by "the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018)", which occurred within the last one month from inclusion phase would be excluded from this study. * Patients who have received percutaneous coronary intervention (including stent implantation, plain old balloon angioplasty, and DCB angioplasty) within 12 months on the target vessel before the index procedure. * Currently recommended indications for DCB: in-stent restenosis, complex bifurcation lesions requiring concomitant intervention of the major vessel and its adjacent side branch (e.g., lesions requiring dual stent implantation, kissing balloon technique, etc.) * Lesions with any of the following anatomical characteristics presumably not suitable for DCB treatment: 1. long lesion with length \>= 40mm. 2. severe tortuous, or severe angulated vessels, especially when vessel recoil seems possible. 3. Chronic total occlusion * Definition: A lesion of a coronary artery becomes completely blocked for a duration of greater than or equal to 3 months based on angiographic evidence. 4. lesions in left main coronary artery 5. lesions in venous or arterial graft * Chronic heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35% after 6 months of Guideline-Directed Medical Treatment (GDMT) * Acute heart failure, hemodynamic instability, or cardiogenic shock * Acute heart failure is defined as a rapid onset of new or worsening signs and symptoms of heart failure. * Non-cardiac Comorbidities: 1. Severe liver insufficiency defined as 1 of the following: * alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase more than 5-fold of upper reference limit. * Child-Pugh grade B or C. 2. Severe renal insufficiency with estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 30 ml/min/1.73m2. 3. Malignant tumor. 4. A life expectancy of less than 1 year. * Unsuitable for coronary intervention or long-term antithrombotic therapy 1. Myocardial bridging located at target lesions. 2. Major bleeding (BARC type 3 to 5) or active pathological bleeding (including gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding) within 3 months, or major surgery within 2 months. 3. Intolerable to double (aspirin plus P2Y12 inhibitor) or single (aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor) antiplatelet therapy. 4. History of intracranial hemorrhage. 5. Pregnant women, lactating women, and women of childbearing potential. * History of artificial valve replacement. * History of participating in any other clinical studies or trials within 12 months before the index procedure. * Participants deemed unsuitable to be enrolled by investigators, such as conditions that may result in protocol nonadherence.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for De novo stenosis are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Beijing, 100037, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can balloon timing make or break heart artery success?
- Can a 'Scoring' balloon unclog leg arteries better and reduce stents?
- Brain artery stent coated with drug may cut stroke risk better than pills alone
- Balloon or stent? major trial tests safer option for clogged heart arteries
- Stent-Free strategy shows promise for Rock-Hard heart arteries
- Could some heart patients safely stop blood thinners after ablation?