Balloon or stent? new study aims to find safer option for heart patients
NCT ID NCT07442500
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two treatments for coronary artery disease: a drug-coated balloon and a drug-eluting stent. It focuses on patients with high bleeding risk who need a simpler approach. Researchers will track heart attacks, strokes, and bleeding events to see which option is safer and more effective.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 470,000 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Feb 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients with de novo coronary artery disease for relatively simple lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention * Used devices number less than three (relatively simple lesion) Exclusion Criteria: * Hybrid strategy (DCB and DES use) * Failed percutaneous coronary intervention * Previous revascularization procedure before index percutaneous coronary intervention
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Coronary artery disease are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 06351, South Korea
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- SMART-I: SiroMax™ Multi-Center coronary artery lesion treatment - safety and feasibility study of SiroMax SCB in ISR and DNSV
- Hospital-to-Home transitional cardiac rehabilitation as a transition from Centre-Based cardiac rehabilitation after cardiac surgery: a Single-Blind randomised controlled trial
- Opportunistic screening of coronary artery calcium on Non-Gated routine chest CT using artificial intelligence: retrospective external validation and clinical risk stratification
- AI heart scan software aims to spot dangerous blockages without invasive probes
- A shot of nicorandil before stenting might keep blood flowing
- Can personalized breathing settings protect lungs during heart surgery?