Breathing vs. beating: which technique clears lungs better in cystic fibrosis?

NCT ID NCT07729787

First seen Jul 28, 2026 · Last updated Jul 29, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two airway clearance methods—autogenic drainage (a controlled breathing technique) and mechanical percussion (a device that taps the chest)—in children aged 6 to 12 with cystic fibrosis. Over six weeks, participants will receive one of the two therapies five times per week. Researchers will measure changes in lung function, breathlessness, and quality of life to see which approach offers greater benefit.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
autogenic drainage (a breathing-based airway clearance technique) and mechanical percussion (a device-based chest therapy)
What this could lead to
If one technique proves superior, it could become the preferred airway clearance method for children with cystic fibrosis, improving breathing and daily life.
What could go wrong
This is a small, short-term study (32 children, 6 weeks). Results may not apply to all ages or disease severities, and neither technique may show a clear advantage.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CYSTIC FIBROSIS (CF) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Nishter Hospital Multan

    RECRUITING

    Multan Khurd, Punjab Province, 59300, Pakistan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.