Brain bleed breakthrough? massive study tests surgery vs. standard care
NCT ID NCT05975398
First seen Jul 10, 2026 · Last updated Jul 10, 2026
Summary
This large registry study tracks 2,000 adults in China with severe spontaneous brain hemorrhage to compare outcomes of emergency surgery versus conservative (non-surgical) treatment. It focuses on patients who take long-term antiplatelet drugs (like aspirin) to see if surgery is safe and effective for them. Researchers also monitor complications like bleeding after surgery and disorders of consciousness. The goal is to generate real-world evidence to guide treatment decisions for this life-threatening condition.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could clarify whether emergency surgery saves more lives than standard care for severe brain bleeds, particularly in patients on blood thinners.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational registry, not a controlled experiment, so results may show associations but not prove cause and effect. Findings may not apply outside China.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 2,000 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Nov 2019
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2030
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients with spontaneous, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage enrolled in the ongoing CRISIH registry at participating clinical centers in China, receiving surgical or conservative management according to clinical indications and routine clinical practice. Severe spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SSICH) is defined as supratentorial hematoma volume \>30 mL, infratentorial hematoma volume \>10 mL, midline shift \>1 cm, large intraventricular hematoma, or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score \<13.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 18 years or older. 2. Spontaneous, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. 3. Treatment with surgical or conservative management according to clinical indications and routine clinical practice. 4. Written informed consent provided by the patient or legally authorized representative/family member. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients had cerebrovascular diseases associated with hemorrhage, such as intracranial aneurysm, cerebrovascular malformation, or intracranial tumors. 2. Hemorrhagic transformation of cerebral infarction. 3. Hemorrhage caused by cerebral venous thrombosis. 4. Patients with severe coagulation disorder, such as hemophilia. 5. Patients with coagulation dysfunction caused by malignant tumor, hepatic insufficiency, renal dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, coagulation diseases, or related conditions. 6. Patients receiving other anticoagulation medications, including vitamin K antagonists or novel oral anticoagulants. 7. Patients who died before arrival at the hospital, on arrival at the hospital, or within a short period (6 hours) after admission.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Complications are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Tiantan Hospital
RECRUITINGBeijing, Beijing Municipality, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Training may cut dangerous complications when ICU patients need breathing tubes
- Can a simple shield keep IVs in place longer for cancer patients?
- Can a gentle ear zap wake the brain after a bleed?
- Can a 'temporal interference' electric field nudge the brain back toward awareness?
- Can a tiny dose of norepinephrine prevent organ damage during emergency surgery?
- Can COVID-19 and emergency surgery be safely managed together? a massive hospital study seeks answers