Which works better for bladder leaks: e-consult or nurse co-management?

NCT ID NCT06040645

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two methods of delivering care for urinary incontinence in primary care settings. In one arm, primary care doctors get electronic specialist advice (e-consult). In the other, a nurse practitioner (APP) provides education and self-management coaching via telemedicine. The trial enrolls 1200 women and measures how well doctors follow evidence-based guidelines and how patients' symptoms improve.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could show which care model works better for treating urinary incontinence in primary care, leading to improved patient outcomes and more efficient use of specialists.
What could go wrong
This is a comparative effectiveness study, not a test of a new drug or device. Results may not apply to all healthcare settings or patient populations.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for URINARY INCONTINENCE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Urinary Incontinence

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • University of California Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States

  • University of California San Diego

    San Diego, California, 92093, United States

  • University of Kansas

    Lawrence, Kansas, 66045, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.