Which prosthetic control is better? new study aims to find out

NCT ID NCT07075042

Recruiting now Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Virginia Commonwealth University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two methods for controlling a prosthetic arm: direct control (using signals from two muscles) and pattern recognition (using signals from several muscles to better understand the user's intended movement). Researchers want to see which method is easier to use and more helpful in everyday activities. The study involves 32 adults with below-the-elbow limb loss who will try each control method for three months.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AMPUTATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

AMPUTATION PROSTHESIS USE

Contacts and locations

Locations

Hanger Inc.
RECRUITING

Austin, Texas, 78758, United States
Virginia Commonwealth University
RECRUITING

Richmond, Virginia, 232398, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.