Which intubation tool works best? trial puts three devices Head-to-Head

NCT ID NCT07699653

First seen Jul 13, 2026 · Last updated Jul 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares three devices—SPHJ-II, a video lighted stylet, and a visual fiberscope—for placing a breathing tube in adults under general anesthesia. About 549 participants will be randomly assigned to one device to see which gives the highest first-attempt success rate. The study also measures intubation time, number of attempts, and any complications. Results could help guide which tool anesthesiologists use for safer airway management.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
SPHJ-II visual lighted stylet, video lighted stylet, visual intubation fiberscope
What this could lead to
If one device proves superior, it could become the preferred tool for safer, faster intubation during general anesthesia.
What could go wrong
This is a device comparison study, not a test of a new drug or cure. Results may not apply to all patients or settings, and individual device performance can vary.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AIRWAY MANAGEMENT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

    Contact

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.