Please sign in to follow a disease.
Which video laryngoscope works best when the neck Can't move?
NCT ID NCT07802522
First seen Sep 03, 2026 · Last updated Sep 04, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial tests four different videolaryngoscopes, including the VisionPro, to see which one performs best when inserting a breathing tube in patients whose neck is immobilized with a cervical collar. The study includes 200 adults undergoing laparoscopic surgery, all with a collar in place to simulate a neck injury. Researchers will measure how often the tube is placed successfully on the first try and how long the procedure takes. The goal is to find the most reliable device for difficult airway situations.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- VisionPro hyperangulated videolaryngoscope, a device used for tracheal intubation
- What this could lead to
- If the VisionPro performs well, it could become a preferred tool for safely intubating patients with cervical spine injuries, potentially reducing complications.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single-center trial with 200 patients, so results may not apply broadly. The study compares devices, not patient outcomes, and success depends on operator skill.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 200 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Aug 2026
- Expected to finish
-
Oct 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * ASA status 1-3 * aged over 18 years old * male and female * laparoscopic surgery Exclusion Criteria: * known difficult laryngoscopy * difficult face mask ventilation * aged under 18 years old * previous history of awake tracheal intubation * patients with BMI \> 30 kg m-2
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Airway management are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Uniwersytet Radomski
Radom, Masovian Voivodeship, 26-600, Poland
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can ultrasound predict airway device success in older adults?
- Can a gentler oxygen flow keep breathing steady during eye surgery?
- Can AI read ultrasound to ensure a clear airway?
- Can a camera guide safer breathing tubes during endoscopy?
- Could a single device make emergency intubation faster and safer?
- Can a nasal cannula outperform a face mask in keeping patients oxygenated during emergency intubation?