New study compares high-tech heart mapping vs. standard x-ray for AFib treatment
NCT ID NCT07035288
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 40 adults with atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat) to compare two ways of performing a common treatment called pulmonary vein isolation. One method uses advanced 3D heart mapping, while the other relies on standard X-ray guidance. The goal was to see which approach leads to better long-term results and fewer side effects.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AF) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital
Athens, Attica, 11527, Greece