Which womb biopsy method works best? new study compares two common techniques
NCT ID NCT07349108
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 126 women aged 30-60 with abnormal uterine bleeding to compare two methods of taking a womb lining sample: manual vacuum aspiration and dilatation and curettage. The goal was to see which method gives a better tissue sample for diagnosing the cause of bleeding, including cancer. Researchers also measured pain levels 24 hours after the procedure.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ABNORMAL UTERINE BLEEDING are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Sheikh Zayed Medical college/hospital
Rahim Yar Khan, Punjab Province, 75000, Pakistan