Which womb biopsy method works best? new study compares two common techniques
NCT ID NCT07349108
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 126 women aged 30-60 with abnormal uterine bleeding to compare two methods of taking a womb lining sample: manual vacuum aspiration and dilatation and curettage. The goal was to see which method gives a better tissue sample for diagnosing the cause of bleeding, including cancer. Researchers also measured pain levels 24 hours after the procedure.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ABNORMAL UTERINE BLEEDING are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Sheikh Zayed Medical college/hospital
Rahim Yar Khan, Punjab Province, 75000, Pakistan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can watching videos before surgery calm nerves?
- New tool could sharpen hysteroscopy training
- New stitch could speed up hysterectomy surgery
- New handmade IUD aims to stay put in women with adenomyosis
- Could a deep breath replace a clamp? new study tests Pain-Free biopsy
- Which biopsy method is better for diagnosing uterine bleeding?