Could skipping random biopsies during colonoscopy be just as safe for IBD patients?
NCT ID NCT05809999
First seen Jul 07, 2026 · Last updated Jul 08, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two ways of doing colonoscopy in people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are at higher risk for colon cancer. One method takes biopsies only from visible abnormal areas, while the other also takes random biopsies from normal-looking tissue. The goal is to see if the simpler approach misses any pre-cancerous growths. About 1,400 adults with IBD will take part.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If skipping random biopsies proves non-inferior, future IBD surveillance could be faster and less invasive without missing dangerous growths.
- What could go wrong
- This is a non-inferiority trial, so it may show that skipping random biopsies misses some pre-cancerous lesions. Results may not apply to all IBD patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
1,411 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Sep 2022
- Finished
-
Feb 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 100 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Each potential participant must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study. * ≥ 18 years old * Historical endoscopic/histologic disease extending beyond the rectum in UC or involving ≥ 1/3 of colorectum in CD\> 50% of colon present, with remaining colon meeting above minimum criteria for disease extent (beyond rectum in UC, ≥1/3 colorectum in CD) * cIBD ≥ 8 years duration (or at any time after diagnosis if a patient also has primary sclerosing cholangitis) * In symptomatic remission at time of colonoscopy * For CD: Harvey-Bradshaw Index \< 541 * For UC or IBDU: Partial Mayo Score ≤ 242 * Major purpose of colonoscopy is neoplasia screening/surveillance * Undergoing colonoscopy with high-definition white light endoscopy Exclusion Criteria: * Persons who are unable to provide informed consent * Persons with a history of colorectal cancer * Persons with prior subtotal or total colectomy (\>50% of colon removed) * Persons undergoing repeat colonoscopy to follow-up on recently diagnosed neoplasia identified within the past year * Persons undergoing pancolonic chromoendoscopy or pancolonic virtual chromoendoscopy * Colon mucosa visibility deemed inadequate for surveillance after washing/suctioning (Boston Bowel Preparation Score of 0 or 1 in any segment) * Incomplete colonoscopy (unable to reach cecum or terminal ileum \[if no cecum\]) * Moderate-to-severe inflammation (Mayo 2-3) involving ≥ 25% of colorectum or mild inflammation (Mayo 1) involving ≥ 50% of colorectum
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Colonic neoplasms are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Eastern Regional Health Authority
St. John's, NFLD, A1B 3V6, Canada
-
Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 8E7, Canada
-
London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital
London, Ontario, Canada
-
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
-
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
-
Nova Scotia Health Authority
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
-
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada
-
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
-
Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
-
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
-
University of Manitoba, Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A randomized, wait List-Controlled, clinical trial of IBD strong peer for Self-Management of psychological distress by persons living with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD)
- A simple stool test might replace scopes for kids with gut issues
- Can a platform trial match the right drug combo to each tumor?
- Can a laser scan catch mouth cancer before it spreads?
- A blood test to replace the scope? new ratios may spot IBD flares
- Ancient wisdom meets AI: could TCM features sharpen colorectal screening?