Antibiotic drip showdown: continuous vs. intermittent for bone infections
NCT ID NCT03246360
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at two different ways of giving the antibiotic cloxacillin to treat bone and joint infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. Twelve patients received the drug both as a steady drip (continuous infusion) and as short doses (intermittent infusion) to see if the amount of drug in the blood was similar. The goal was to find out if one method works as well as the other, not to test a new cure.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for INFECTION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
CHU de Nice
Nice, France