Anal fissure surgery showdown: closed vs open technique
NCT ID NCT07496216
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two surgical methods for treating chronic anal fissures in 160 adults. The goal was to see which technique leads to faster wound healing, less pain, and fewer complications like incontinence or recurrence. Participants were randomly assigned to either closed or open surgery, and followed for up to one year.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CHRONIC ANAL FISSURE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Services Institute of Medical Sciences
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- AI-Powered patient handouts could boost treatment success for anal fissures
- Will surgery improve sex life for women with anal problems? new study aims to find out
- Botox injection study aims to heal painful anal fissures
- New study aims to find the best surgical approach for anal fissures
- Experimental cell injection aims to heal painful anal fissures
- New surgery aims to heal painful anal fissures