Does how you start a glucose monitor matter? new study says maybe

NCT ID NCT05928572

Completed Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Holly Willis Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looked at 159 adults with type 2 diabetes to see if the way they are introduced to a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) affects their blood sugar control. One group received a nutrition-focused approach, while the other used a self-directed method. The main goal was to measure time in range—the percentage of time blood sugar stays between 70 and 180 mg/dL. The study also examined diet quality and what happens when CGM use is paused for four months.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: continuous glucose monitor (CGM) initiation approach
What this could lead to: If successful, this could show that a nutrition-focused introduction to CGM helps people with type 2 diabetes better manage their blood sugar levels.
What could go wrong: This is a small, completed study comparing two educational approaches, not testing a new drug or device. Results may not apply to everyone with type 2 diabetes.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for TYPE 2 DIABETES are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

type 2 diabetes mellitus

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

TYPE 2 DIABETES

Contacts and locations

Locations

HealthPartners Institute dba International Diabetes Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55416, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.