Fingertip test may rival blood test in sepsis care
NCT ID NCT06727318
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 192 adults with septic shock to see if a simple finger-pressure test (capillary refill time) could predict outcomes as well as a standard blood test (lactate level). Researchers measured both at the same time and tracked which patients got worse or died within 28 days. The goal was to find a faster, cheaper way to monitor these critically ill patients.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help doctors use a simple bedside test (capillary refill) to quickly assess septic shock patients, potentially improving care.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational study, not a treatment trial. It only looks at correlations, so it cannot prove that using capillary refill improves survival.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HYPOTENSIVE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Healty Sciences University Gulhane Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, KEÇİÖREN, 06010, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can we optimize antibiotic dosing for children with sepsis?
- Could starting feeds sooner shield preterm babies from infection?
- Can brain waves predict thinking problems after sepsis?
- Can tailored nutrition boost recovery in the ICU?
- Blood markers may foretell brain fog after sepsis
- A hidden clue in the fingertips: could a pulse oximeter reading forecast sepsis outcomes?