Which anesthesia is safer for septic lungs? new trial aims to find out

NCT ID NCT07601256

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study will compare two common anesthesia methods—inhaled gas versus intravenous drugs—to see which one causes less lung injury after major surgery in patients with sepsis. About 480 adults with sepsis who need surgery will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Researchers will track how many days patients need a ventilator and monitor their recovery for up to 90 days after surgery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
sevoflurane (inhalation anesthesia) and ciprofol (intravenous anesthesia), both with remifentanil
What this could lead to
If it works, this could show that one type of anesthesia is better at protecting the lungs of sepsis patients during surgery, potentially improving recovery.
What could go wrong
This is an early-stage trial (Phase NA) testing a comparison of existing drugs, not a new treatment. The results may show no difference or may not apply to all sepsis patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LUNG INJURY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.