Video-Assisted airway device may improve First-Attempt intubation success

NCT ID NCT07704723

First seen Jul 15, 2026 · Last updated Jul 16, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial tests whether a video-assisted supraglottic airway device helps doctors insert a breathing tube more successfully on the first try compared to a conventional device. The study involves 204 adults undergoing planned surgery with general anesthesia. Neither device uses a fiberoptic scope, which is often unavailable. The goal is to find a safer, more effective way to manage airways in routine surgeries.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Video-assisted supraglottic airway device (SaCo VLM) and conventional intubating supraglottic airway device (AirQ)
What this could lead to
If video-assisted devices prove more reliable, they could become a safer, easier option for airway management when fiberoptic tools are unavailable.
What could go wrong
This is a single-center trial with 204 participants, so results may not apply to all settings. The devices are compared only in elective surgeries, not emergencies.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AIRWAY MANAGEMENT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.