Video-Assisted airway device may improve First-Attempt intubation success
NCT ID NCT07704723
First seen Jul 15, 2026 · Last updated Jul 16, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial tests whether a video-assisted supraglottic airway device helps doctors insert a breathing tube more successfully on the first try compared to a conventional device. The study involves 204 adults undergoing planned surgery with general anesthesia. Neither device uses a fiberoptic scope, which is often unavailable. The goal is to find a safer, more effective way to manage airways in routine surgeries.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Video-assisted supraglottic airway device (SaCo VLM) and conventional intubating supraglottic airway device (AirQ)
- What this could lead to
- If video-assisted devices prove more reliable, they could become a safer, easier option for airway management when fiberoptic tools are unavailable.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single-center trial with 204 participants, so results may not apply to all settings. The devices are compared only in elective surgeries, not emergencies.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 204 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Aug 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Aug 2029
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
19 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 19 years or older. * Scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring tracheal intubation. Exclusion Criteria: * Refusal or inability to provide informed consent. * Emergency surgery. * History of gastroesophageal reflux disease. * Previous surgery or radiotherapy involving the upper airway. * Severely loose teeth. * Any condition considered by the investigator to make study participation inappropriate.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Airway management are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Which video laryngoscope works best when the neck Can't move?
- Can ultrasound predict airway device success in older adults?
- Can a gentler oxygen flow keep breathing steady during eye surgery?
- Can AI read ultrasound to ensure a clear airway?
- Can a camera guide safer breathing tubes during endoscopy?
- Could a single device make emergency intubation faster and safer?