Which ACL surgery is safer for kids? new study compares techniques

NCT ID NCT04644497

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 24, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 120 children who had ACL surgery while their bones were still growing. Researchers compared an older drilling method (2001-2010) with a newer technique that avoids growth plates (2013-2018). They checked leg length, knee angles, and patient-reported outcomes to see which approach works better.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RUPTURE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Aarhus University Hospital

    Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

ACL reconstruction surgery (transphyseal vs. physeal sparing technique)

What this could lead to

If one technique proves safer for growing bones, it could guide surgeons toward the best approach for young patients.

What could go wrong

This is an observational study, not a controlled trial, so results may be influenced by other factors. It also only looks back at past records, which can limit reliability.

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.