Can whole blood beat component transfusions in trauma?
NCT ID NCT05638581
First seen Aug 11, 2026 · Last updated Aug 12, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial asks whether giving severely injured patients whole blood (Low-Titer Group O) is better than giving them separate blood components (red cells, plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate) during emergency transfusions. It enrolls about 1,100 adults with major traumatic bleeding who need large-volume transfusions. The main goal is to see if whole blood improves survival within the first 6 hours after transfusion begins.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Low-Titer Group O Whole Blood (LTOWB) compared with standard blood components (red cells, plasma, platelets, cryoprecipitate)
- What this could lead to
- If whole blood proves better, it could become the standard emergency transfusion for trauma, potentially saving more lives in the critical first hours.
- What could go wrong
- The trial is large but results may not apply to all settings, and whole blood may not always be available or superior for every patient.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 3
Large-scale testing in a bigger group. Usually the last step before a treatment can be approved.
- Participants
-
About 1,100 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Jul 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Jun 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
15 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult trauma patient (estimated age \> 15 or weight \> 50 kg, if age unknown) 2. Patient taken to trauma center directly from scene 3. Commencement of blood transfusion (PRBC, plasma or LTOWB), in pre-hospital or in-hospital setting 4. Activation of site-specific Massive Hemorrhage Protocol or Massive Transfusion Protocol 5. Traumatic injury with at least one of the following: 1. Confirmed or suspected acute major bleeding 2. Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) Score ≥2 Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients who have received, prehospital or in-hospital more than two units of LTOWB; the equivalent in components (two units of packed red blood cells and two units of plasma); or a combination of the two (more than one unit of LTOWB, one unit of packed cells, and one unit of plasma). Most trauma centers hold two units of either packed red blood cells (with two units of plasma) or two units of LTOWB in the emergency department. This stock is used to initiate transfusion, while the massive hemorrhage protocol is activated from the blood bank. 2. Patients transferred from another hospital 3. Children \<15 years (in most communities, patients aged 15-18 years are treated at adult trauma centers, and patients in this age group frequently suffer life-threatening injuries, and will therefore be included) 4. Known prisoners, defined as individuals involuntarily confined or detained in a penal institution (including juvenile detention, involuntary psychiatric commitment, or court-ordered residential substance abuse treatment) 5. Moribund patients expected to die within 1 hour 6. Patients who required an ED thoracotomy or received more than 5 consecutive minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (prior to receiving randomized blood products) 7. Patients with known "do not resuscitate" orders prior to randomization 8. Patients who refuse the administration of blood products 9. Individuals with a research "opt out" bracelet. 10. Greater than 20% total body surface area (TBSA) burns 11. Suspected inhalation injury victims 12. Patients who are obviously pregnant on clinical examination or known to be pregnant as provided by the subject or legally authorized representative
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Shock, hemorrhagic are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
13 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGWinston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
-
Froedtert Hospital
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGMilwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
-
Harborview Medical Center
RECRUITINGSeattle, Washington, 98104, United States
-
Los Angeles County + University of Southern California (LAC + USC) Medical Center
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGLos Angeles, California, 90033, United States
-
Oregon Health and Sciences University Hospital
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGPortland, Oregon, 97239, United States
-
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
-
University Medical Center New Orleans LCMC Health
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGNew Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
-
University of Alabama at Birmingham, UAB Hospital
RECRUITINGBirmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
-
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
RECRUITINGCincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States
-
University of Maryland Medical Center
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGBaltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
-
University of Texas Health San Antonio and University Health System
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGSan Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
-
University of Texas Health Science Center Houston
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHouston, Texas, 77030, United States
-
Washington University School of Medicine
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGSt Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Spinal fluid antibody shots tested for fresh spinal cord injuries
- A new physical therapy twist could rebuild knees after dislocation
- Testosterone may rebuild strength after spinal cord injury — trial puts it to the test
- Which humidifier prevents airway blockages in trauma ICU patients?
- Penis transplants could restore form and function for wounded warriors
- New hand transplant protocol aims to cut lifelong drug risks