Can explicit grammar lessons help kids with language disorder?
NCT ID NCT04902508
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Sep 03, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study compares two teaching methods for children aged 5-9 with developmental language disorder. One method uses only traditional implicit teaching (like imitation and practice), while the other adds explicit rule explanations. Over 111 children will receive 32 sessions targeting four grammar forms. Researchers will track how well children learn and remember the grammar up to a year later, aiming to find the best teaching sequence.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- behavioural intervention (grammar teaching methods)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could point toward more effective teaching strategies for children with developmental language disorder.
- What could go wrong
- This is an early-stage study with only 111 participants, so results may not apply to all children. The benefit of adding explicit instruction may be small or not lasting.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
111 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Feb 2022
- Expected to finish
-
Jul 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
5 to 9 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: Study participants will include children with language impairment, aged 5 through 9 years. Participants will not have any indication of other significant conditions to which their impairment may be attributed, such as autism spectrum disorder, Down syndrome, seizure disorder, or hearing impairment. Participants with a diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder will be included due to high rate of co-morbidity (see Redmond, 2016). Additionally, participants will meet the following criteria: * No evidence of significant cognitive delay; * Evidence of language impairment; * Evidence of deficits on expressive grammatical forms: score below 30% accuracy on at least two of the following forms: third person singular -s, regular past tense -ed, auxiliary is/are in statements, auxiliary do/does in questions; * Typical hearing and vision, with correction if necessary; * Native English speaker with English spoken in the home by at least one primary caregiver since birth; * Speaker of Mainstream American English; * Be able to articulate final-position phonemes /s/, /z/, /t/, and /d/; and * Majority of utterances (\> 50%) include subject and verb in obligated contexts based on a 20-min conversational language sample to ensure appropriateness of study intervention. Exclusion Criteria: Participants will be excluded if there is no indication of language impairment, and they are not aged 5 through 9 years. Participants will also be excluded if there is indication of other significant conditions to which their impairment may be attributed, such as autism spectrum disorder, Down syndrome, seizure disorder, or hearing impairment. Additionally, participants will be excluded in they meet the following criteria: * Evidence of significant cognitive delay; * No evidence of deficits on expressive grammatical forms: score below 30% accuracy on at least two of the following forms: third person singular -s, regular past tense -ed, auxiliary is/are in statements, auxiliary do/does in questions; * Atypical hearing and vision, with correction if necessary; * Non-native English speaker; * Speaker of Non-mainstream American English; * Unable to articulate final-position phonemes /s/, /z/, /t/, and /d/; and * Non-majority of utterances (\< 50%) include subject and verb in obligated contexts based on a 20-min conversational language sample to ensure appropriateness of study intervention.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Developmental language disorder are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can personalized recall timing boost word learning in kids with DLD?
- Can Parents' everyday talk rewire young brains to boost language?
- Can quizzing help kids with language delays learn new words?
- Study aims to unlock better learning for kids with language disorder
- Can a better practice schedule boost speech memory in language disorder?
- Brain scans reveal how language therapy rewires Kids' brains