Heart valve showdown: which TAVI design saves more lives?
NCT ID NCT05454150
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This trial compares two types of replacement heart valves used in a procedure called TAVI for people with a narrowed aortic valve. One valve expands with a balloon, the other expands on its own. The study will track about 1,960 patients to see which valve leads to fewer deaths or strokes within 90 days and one year. The goal is to find out if one design is clearly better.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- balloon-expandable valve (Sapien 3/Ultra) or self-expanding valve (Evolut R/Pro)
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could show which valve design is safer and more effective for treating aortic stenosis, potentially changing standard practice.
- What could go wrong
- This is a large but early-stage comparison; results may not show a clear winner, and individual patient factors could still influence outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
1,960 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2035
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
The study population will be comprised of all patients with severe, calcific, symptomatic aortic stenosis eligible to percutaneous transfemoral TAVI with BE or SE-valve according to the investigating center heart team. The inclusion/exclusion criteria are limited and primarily intend to select patient eligible to both BE and SE-valve. This allows for a study cohort whose composition is expected to be close to an all-comers cohort and therefore representative for the standard TAVI population seen in daily practice. Inclusion Criteria: * Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis defined according to the current echocardiography criteria of the European Society of Cardiology guidelines2. * Heart team of the investigating center agrees that the patient is eligible to TAVI with BE-valve SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences©) (or further iterations of the same family) OR TAVI with the SE-valve Evolut-R/pro (Medtronic©) (or futher iterations of the same family). * Heart team of the investigating center agrees that TAVI is feasible via percutaneous transfemoral approach. * Written informed consent to the BEST study * Written informed consent to the FRANCE-TAVI registy * All valve anatomy are authorized (bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valve) Exclusion Criteria: * Age \< 18 years old * Patient with legal protection * Non-affiliation to a social security scheme * Pregnancy * Subject participating in another research protocol on TAVI procedure * Patients presenting with an anatomy that is regarded unsuitable for the implantation of one of the two valve types * TAVI through nontransfemoral approach or surgical cutdown * Valve-in-valve procedure (TAVI in TAVI or TAVI in surgical aortic bioprosthesis) * Implantation of Accurate Neo or Accurate Neo2 valve (Boston scientific) * Severe aortic regurgitation (\>3+) * Refusal to participate to FRANCE-TAVI registry
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Aortic valve stenosis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
AP-HP Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor
Créteil, France
-
AP-HP Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière
Paris, France
-
CH Annecy Genevois
Annecy, France
-
CHU Reims - Hôpitam Robert Debré
Reims, France
-
CHU de Besançon
Besançon, France
-
CHU de Bordeaux Hôpital Pellegrin
Pessac, France
-
CHU de Caen
Caen, France
-
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
-
CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble, France
-
CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier, France
-
CHU de Nantes - Hôpital Laennec
Saint-Herblain, France
-
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, France
-
CHU de Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, France
-
CHU de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, France
-
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, France
-
CHU de Tours
Tours, France
-
Centre Médico Chirurgical Arnault Tzanck
Saint-Laurent-du-Var, France
-
Hôpital Privé Saint-Martin
Caen, France
-
Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud
Massy, France
-
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Paris, France
-
Médipôle Lyon Villeurbanne
Villeurbanne, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can aggressive blood pressure treatment slow aortic valve disease?
- Why do animal heart valves wear out? immune system under investigation
- One scan to rule them all? new CT aims to replace multiple heart tests
- Which heart valve design wins for small aortic openings?
- Can a less invasive valve replacement tame a failing aortic valve?
- Can a new heart valve match the safety of proven ones?