New spine implants tested for safety in patients with back problems
NCT ID NCT04420143
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at the safety and performance of two types of expandable spine implants (MLX and XLX ACR) in 109 adults with degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, or scoliosis. Researchers tracked complications, bone fusion, and improvement in nerve symptoms after surgery. The goal was to understand how well these implants work over the medium to long term.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- expandable lumbar interbody implants (MLX and XLX ACR)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could confirm that these implants are safe and effective for treating degenerative spine conditions, offering a surgical option to reduce pain and improve function.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed study with only 109 participants and no comparison group, so results may not apply to all patients. Risks include complications from surgery and implant failure.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
109 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2020
- Finished
-
Oct 2020
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
At least 90 (75 MLX, 15 XLX ACR) subjects will be enrolled in this multicenter study by at least four investigative sites. A site may have more than one surgeon investigator contributing to the total site enrollment. As a retrospective study, enrollment goals will be determined with the surgeon investigator during site selection by the Sponsor and will be based on available case volume. The site will identify potential subjects who are more than three months from the surgery postoperative time point during the study duration for inclusion in the study.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients who were ≥18 years of age at the time of surgery 2. Underwent spine surgery using either MLX or XLX ACR interbody implant (NuVasive, Inc., San Diego, CA) at: 1. One or two adjacent thoracic and/or lumbar levels for degenerative disc disease or degenerative spondylolisthesis, or 2. Any number of thoracic and/or lumbar levels for degenerative scoliosis (defined as \>10º coronal curve) 3. Interbody fusion with autograft and/or allograft (i.e., cancellous and/or corticocancellous allograft bone) 4. NuVasive supplemental internal fixation cleared by the applicable regulatory body for use in the thoracolumbar spine Exclusion Criteria: 1. Use of any bone graft with the associated interbody implant that is not FDA-cleared for use within interbody implants. Examples of these include: 1. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) (e.g., Infuse (Medtronic)) 2. Synthetic bone graft extenders (e.g., AttraX (NuVasive), Formagraft (NuVasive), Mastergraft (Medtronic), Vitoss (Stryker), Actifuse (Baxter), nanOss (RTI Surgical), Fibergraft (Prosidyan/Depuy Synthes), ChronOs (Depuy Synthes)) 3. Demineralized bone matrices (DBM) regulated as medical devices by the FDA (e.g., Grafton Putty/Gel (Medtronic), DBX (MTF/Depuy Synthes), Accell Evo3 (IsoTis), Propel Putty/Gel (NuVasive)) 4. Peptide enhanced bone graft (e.g., iFactor (Cerapedics)) 2. Previous lumbar fusion surgery at the currently treated level(s) (adjacent-level surgery is acceptable) 3. Systemic or local infection (latent or active) or signs of local inflammation documented at the time of surgery 4. Patient was involved in active litigation relating to the spine during the surgical/postoperative period (worker's compensation claim is allowed if it is not contested) 5. Inadequate bone stock or bone quality documented at the time of surgery 6. Known sensitivity to materials implanted documented at the time of surgery
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Degenerative disc disease are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Carolina NeuroSurgery & Spine Associates
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States
-
Lyerly Neurosurgery
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207, United States
-
OrthoCarolina Research Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
-
Orthopaedic Specialty Institute
Orange, California, 92868, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A conversation before spine surgery could change how patients recover
- Can a new bone graft match the gold standard for spinal fusion?
- Can a nanotube surface help spinal bones fuse faster?
- Can a growth factor from donor bone improve spinal fusion?
- Can a One-Day mindset workshop stop chronic pain after back surgery?
- Can a brace and targeted exercises ease spondylolisthesis pain?