Spinal zaps help scientists map nerve damage in kids with spina bifida
NCT ID NCT06918119
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study uses mild electrical stimulation on the skin of the lower back to measure how well nerves and muscles work in 30 children and teens with spina bifida. Researchers will test muscle strength, spasticity, walking speed, and coordination. The goal is to better understand sensorimotor deficits, not to treat the condition.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 30 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Aug 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Jul 2030
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
5 to 18 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria * Congenital diagnosis of myelomeningocele (MMC) * Able to follow verbal commands or instructions. * If female and able to become pregnant, must be willing to use medically-acceptable method of contraception during study participation. Exclusion Criteria * Severe cognitive deficits demonstrating inability to communicate needs * Gaping, weeping, or unhealed open wounds at the site of electrode placement * Unhealed fractures on load bearing bones * History of osteoporosis * History of implanted electronic devices at the stimulation location(e.g. deep brain stimulator, cardiac pacemaker, diaphragmatic pacer, baclofen pumps, insulin pumps, etc.) * Pregnancy * Epilepsy * History of seizure * Ongoing infections (currently being treated or are symptomatic) * Any illness or condition which, based on the research team's assessment, will compromise the patient's ability to comply with the protocol, patient safety, or the validity of the data collected during this study.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Myelomeningocele are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
RECRUITINGRochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a simple device stop enema leaks for spina bifida patients?
- Can a diabetes drug curb obesity in kids with movement challenges?
- Running reimagined: could an adapted program get kids moving?
- Can a new workout boost balance in teens with movement disabilities?
- Can breathing power boost balance and Well-Being in paralympic athletes?
- Can a robotic suit help kids with neurological conditions walk better?