Which sedation works best for stent removal? new study compares options
NCT ID NCT07580768
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested three sedation approaches for removing a Double-J ureteral stent, a common procedure. Sixty adults received either propofol alone, propofol plus dexmedetomidine, or propofol plus midazolam. Researchers measured total propofol use and sedation levels to find the most effective and safe combination.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Propofol, dexmedetomidine, midazolam
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could identify a safer or more effective sedation combination for a common urological procedure.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with 60 participants, so results may not apply broadly. Sedation risks like breathing problems or low blood pressure are possible.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
60 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Nov 2024
- Finished
-
Oct 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
21 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age from 21 to 65 years. * Both sex. * Physical status of the patients were from I-III according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). * Patients underwent Double-J ureteral stent removal. Exclusion Criteria: * Symptoms of lower urinary tract infection. * Stenosis of the urethra during cystoscopy. * Renal impairment (serum creatinine \>1.5 mg/dL). * Chronic pain syndrome. * Mental disorder and difficulty in communication. * History of chronic use of sedatives, alcohol and narcotics. * Bradycardia (heart rate less than 50 beats per minute). * Systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg. * Taking a sedative or analgesic 24 hours before surgery. * Body mass index (BMI) equal or over 35 kg/m2. * History of allergy to one of the drugs used in the study.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dexmedetomidine are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Tanta University
Tanta, El-Gharbia, 31527, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a sedative plus ear stimulation stop PTSD before it starts?
- Can a small dose of ketamine make colonoscopy sedation safer?
- Can a Mini-Dose drug combo rescue Post-Surgery sleep for sleep apnea patients?
- Can a nasal spray calm nerves before brain surgery?
- Could a common sedative shield aging brains from Post-Surgery delirium?
- Can a gentle oxygen boost make lung biopsies safer and faster?