Stroke study tests best anesthesia for clot removal
NCT ID NCT03737786
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two types of general anesthesia during emergency clot removal for stroke patients. The goal is to see which method better maintains blood flow to the brain and improves recovery. About 90 adults with severe stroke will take part at two hospitals in Los Angeles.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 90 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Nov 2019
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 110 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age ≥18 2. NIHSS ≥ 6 within 0-16h or NIHSS ≥ 10 within 16-24h 3. Anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ICA, M1, M2) 4. ASPECTS score ≥ 6 within the first 6h, or DEFUSE trial imaging criteria within 6-16h; or DAWN trial clinical/imaging mismatch criteria within 16-24h 5. Premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 6. Patient deemed candidate for mechanical thrombectomy with anticipated groin puncture within 24 hours of last known well and within 90 min of ED arrival Clinical Exclusion Criteria: 1. Intubation in ED prior to anesthesiologist evaluation, or intubation for any other medical reason other than planned thrombectomy 2. Rapid neurological improvement, suggestive of revascularization 3. Known serious sensitivity to radiographic contrast agents. 4. Current participation in another investigational drug or device treatment study. 5. Renal Failure as defined by a serum creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dl (or 176.8 μmol/l) or Glomerular Filtration Rate \[GFR\] \< 30. 6. Subject who requires hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, or who have a contraindication to an angiogram for whatever reason. 7. Life expectancy of less than 90 days. 8. Clinical presentation suggests a subarachnoid hemorrhage, even if initial CT or MRI scan is normal 9. Subject with a co-morbid disease or condition that would confound the neurological and functional evaluations or compromise survival or ability to complete follow up assessments. 10. Subject currently uses or has a recent history of illicit drug(s) or abuses alcohol (defined as regular or daily consumption of more than 4 alcoholic drinks per day. 11. Septic or cardiogenic shock with severe life-threatening hypotension Imaging Exclusion Criteria: 1. Computed tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) evidence of acute intracranial hemorrhage on presentation. 2. CT or MRI evidence of mass effect or intracranial tumor (except small meningioma). 3. CT showing hypodensity or MRI showing hyperintensity involving greater than 1/3 of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory (or in other territories, \>100 cc of tissue) on presentation. 4. Baseline non contrast CT or DWI MRI evidence of a moderate/large core defined as extensive early ischemic changes of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) \< 6 5. CT or MRI evidence that ischemia is not in anterior circulation distribution. 6. Imaging evidence that suggests, in the opinion of the investigator, the subject is not appropriate for mechanical thrombectomy intervention (e.g., inability to navigate to target lesion, moderate/large infarct with poor collateral circulation, etc.). Anesthesia exclusion criteria (relative): 1. History of Malignant Hyperthermia 2. History of allergic reaction/anaphylaxis to anesthetic drugs 3. Inability to tolerate supine position (severe CHF) 4. Chronic O2 dependence or any other known pulmonary condition that might lead to difficult extubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation including known pulmonary hypertension
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
UCLA Stroke Center
RECRUITINGLos Angeles, California, 90095, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Robots and brain scans probe how stroke survivors relearn arm skills
- Virtual reality may soothe Stroke-Related agitation
- AI could forecast stroke outcomes in real time
- Breathing new life: could targeted muscle training speed stroke recovery?
- Could muscle loss predict stroke recovery?
- A Pocket-Sized MRI for strokes? new device put to the test