Sedation may ease risky lung exam in breathless patients
NCT ID NCT00741949
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether giving propofol sedation during a lung exam (bronchoscopy) under noninvasive ventilation helps patients with severe breathing failure stay more comfortable and maintain oxygen levels. Forty-six adults with acute respiratory failure needing a diagnostic lung exam took part. Half received propofol sedation, half received a placebo, and researchers measured oxygen saturation, patient comfort, and procedure success.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Propofol
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could make bronchoscopy safer and more comfortable for patients with severe breathing problems, reducing the need for a breathing tube.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed Phase 3 trial with only 46 participants, so results may not apply broadly. Propofol sedation can lower blood pressure or slow breathing, which could be risky in these patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 3
Large-scale testing in a bigger group. Usually the last step before a treatment can be approved.
- Participants
-
About 46 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Start date
-
Sep 2008
- Finished
-
Jun 2011
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 90 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Acute respiratory failure defined by clinical signs of respiratory failure (polypnea, use of accessory respiratory muscle) and a PaO2/FiO2 ratio \< 250 * Need for a diagnosis FOB with BAL * Informed consent signed Exclusion Criteria: * Contraindication of NIV * FOB with bronchial biopsies * Acute coronary syndrome * Thrombopenia \< 30.000 / mm3 despite platelets transfusion * Coagulation disorders * PaO2/FiO2 ratio \< 80 under NIV * Persistent respiratory acidosis under NIV (pH \< 7,32) * Propofol allergy * Xylocaïne allergy * Pregnancy * Age \< 18 years or \> 90 years * Weight \> 150 kg or \< 30 kg * Inclusion in another clinical protocol
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Centre hospitalier Libourne
Libourne, 33505, France
-
University Hospital Bordeaux, Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin
Bordeaux, 33076, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a portable ventilator match hospital machines? trial puts them head to head
- Steroid dose showdown: can more dexamethasone save lives in respiratory failure?
- Could letting patients breathe on their own sooner protect their lungs?
- Scientists hunt for hidden subgroups in sudden respiratory failure
- Can a machine breathe better than a nurse? automated oxygen system tested in COPD
- A global effort to make moving critically ill patients safer