Can a portable ventilator match hospital machines? trial puts them head to head
NCT ID NCT00810498
First seen Sep 21, 2026 · Last updated Sep 21, 2026
Summary
Researchers compare the Trilogy ventilator, a portable breathing machine, with conventional mechanical ventilators in people who need breathing support. Participants use each device for one hour while set to their usual breathing mode and prescription settings. The study measures blood gas levels and oxygen saturation to see whether the Trilogy delivers similar breathing support. This small trial includes 11 adults who are clinically stable and require ventilation through a mask or tube.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Trilogy portable ventilator
- What this could lead to
- If the Trilogy device matches conventional ventilators, it could offer a more portable option for people who need breathing support outside a hospital.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small study of 11 people, so the results may not apply to everyone. Participants must be clinically stable, and the short one-hour testing period may not reflect long-term use.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
11 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Mar 2008
- Finished
-
Feb 2009
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
21 to 85 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age \> 21 years of age; \< 85 years of age 2. Able to follow instructions 3. Able to provide informed consent 4. Considered clinically stable, with low flow oxygen requirements less than 15 LPM (or FIO2 less than 60 %) and PEEP no greater than 10 cm H2O. 5. Requiring mechanical ventilation through nasal/facial mask,tracheostomy or endotracheal tube (ET Tube) Exclusion Criteria: 1. Clinically unstable, i.e., 1. Acute Respiratory Failure 2. Participants with refractory hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg despite inotropic agents), 3. Uncontrolled cardiac ischemia or arrhythmias, 4. or as otherwise determined inappropriate for the study as determined by the investigator. 2. Patients suffering from metastatic or terminal cancer and patients with do-not-resuscitate orders 3. Pregnancy
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Respiratory failure are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0Z3, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can tilting a Patient's body toward the infection help them breathe free sooner?
- Can a machine breathe better than a nurse? automated oxygen system tested in COPD
- Can a battery keep ventilators running during ambulance transport?
- Can a simple ultrasound combo predict breathing failure before it happens?
- Could stepping down breathing support sooner save more lives?
- A global effort to make moving critically ill patients safer