Oxygen showdown: tight vs. liberal targets in heart failure
NCT ID NCT05613218
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether giving heart failure patients with fluid in their lungs a lower oxygen target (90% oxygen saturation) or a higher one (96%) leads to better outcomes. 122 patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups in the emergency department. The goal was to see which oxygen level reduces fluid in the lungs and improves recovery.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Oxygen
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could help doctors choose the best oxygen level for heart failure patients, potentially improving recovery and reducing hospital stays.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small pilot study with only 122 patients, so results may not apply to everyone. The oxygen targets are narrow, and the study may not find a clear benefit or harm.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 2/3
Runs two stages together: whether the treatment works, then large-scale confirmation.
- Participants
-
122 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Feb 2024
- Finished
-
Mar 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age ≥ 18 years 2. Acute (within minutes to days) onset or worsening of subjective dyspnea 3. Oxygen saturation \<92% (on arterial blood gas) or need of oxygen 4. At least one of the following clinical or radiological signs of congestion: 1\. Pulmonary rales 2. Chest X-ray or CT with pulmonary congestion 3. Lung ultrasound with multiple B-lines Exclusion Criteria: 1. More than 4 hours from hospital admission to randomization 2. Suspected infection or sepsis 3. Known severe pulmonary disease 4. Systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute heart failure are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Amager-Hvidovre Hospital
Copenhagen, 2650, Denmark
-
Bispebjerg Hospital
Copenhagen, 2200, Denmark
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Zapping a nerve in the ear may stop oxygen drops after surgery
- Can a COPD flare stun the heart? study watches for hidden strain
- Can urine tests guide better diuretic dosing in heart failure?
- Can a new pulse oximeter see through melanin to save more lives?
- Can a smart oxygen device outperform manual care in recovery?
- Can a nasal oxygen device prevent dangerous dips in blood oxygen during endoscopy for COPD patients?