Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Can nerve stretching plus joint mobilization beat tennis elbow?

NCT ID NCT06765798

Symptom relief Sponsor: Safaa Radi Saber Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This completed study tested whether adding nerve mobilization (stretching the radial nerve) to the Mulligan technique (a type of joint mobilization) helps people with chronic tennis elbow. Sixty adults aged 20-60 with elbow pain lasting at least three months took part. Researchers measured pain, arm function, and grip strength to see if the combined approach works better than standard therapy alone.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
neural mobilization and Mulligan mobilization with movement
What this could lead to
If the combination works better than standard care, it could offer a more effective physical therapy approach for chronic tennis elbow pain and disability.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed trial with 60 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The study did not report blinding or long-term follow-up, which limits confidence in the findings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

60 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jan 2025

Finished

Jun 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

20 to 60 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patient aged 20-60 years old * . Diagnosed with chronic tennis elbow * experienced discomfort in their dominant arm, tenderness over the lateral epicondyle of the elbow joint, and exhibited signs and symptoms of tennis elbow persisting for three months * Increased pain with resistant elbow extension, wrist extension, gripping, and supination * ULTT 2 b (radial nerve) should be positive ) pain referral throughout the dorsal and radial aspect of the forearm and, sometimes, an "electrical shock-like" pain on the radial side of the right wrist ( Exclusion Criteria: * patients who had a history of or were suffering from psychogenic stress * acute strain, fractures of the humerus, radius, and ulna, * History of Rheumatoid diseases * Subjects on steroids or any other medications for pain at present were excluded * severe edema, infection * malignancy * osteoporosis * unstable joints * severe neck or shoulder pain, neurological conditions \\ impacting the upper extremity Cervical radiculopathy * Bilateral Symptoms of Tennis elbow

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Tennis elbow are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

epicondylitis

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Tennis elbow

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Delta University

    Gamasa, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.