Keyhole vs open surgery for tennis elbow: which offers better pain relief?
NCT ID NCT07648849
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This trial compares two surgical approaches for tennis elbow that has not improved after at least six months of non-surgical treatments like rest or physical therapy. One group receives keyhole (arthroscopic) surgery, while the other receives traditional open surgery. The main goal is to see which method provides better pain relief after the procedure.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- surgery (arthroscopic or open release)
- What this could lead to
- If one technique proves better, it could become the preferred surgical option for stubborn tennis elbow, offering clearer guidance for patients and surgeons.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center trial with only 50 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Surgery carries standard risks like infection or nerve damage.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 50 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Jun 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Jun 2028
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * tennis elbow not responding to conservative measures (more than 6 months) adult population (more than 18 years) Exclusion Criteria: * Degenerative changes of the elbow (as inflammatory diseases) Previously operated cases Disorganized anatomy of the joint (as in posttraumatic cases) neurovascular compromise of the upper limb
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Tennis elbow are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can adding tape or a splint boost physiotherapy for tennis elbow?
- Mind over elbow: can beliefs predict how tennis elbow patients respond to treatment?
- New combo therapy for tennis elbow shows promise in small trial
- Botox for tennis elbow? new study tests pain relief
- Wrist or shoulder? study tests best exercise for tennis elbow relief
- Shockwave or simple exercises? new study aims to settle tennis elbow debate