Could nerve blocks replace general anesthesia for leg amputations?
NCT ID NCT03404180
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study tested whether using nerve blocks and sedation instead of general anesthesia could make upper leg amputation surgery safer for high-risk patients, such as the elderly or those with diabetes or heart disease. Thirty participants received ultrasound-guided nerve blocks and sedation. The goal was to see if this approach could provide effective pain control and reduce complications.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Peripheral nerve block (procedure) and intravenous sedatives (propofol or dexmedetomidine)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this approach could offer a safer alternative to general anesthesia for high-risk patients needing leg amputations, reducing complications and improving pain control.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-site study with only 30 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. Nerve blocks may not always work as the main anesthetic, and sedation carries its own risks.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
30 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Feb 2018
- Finished
-
Dec 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients undergoing above-the-knee amputation or knee disarticulation * Ability to understand and provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Patient refusal or inability to provide informed consent * True allergy, not sensitivity, to any of the following substances: * \- Local anesthetics * \- Propofol or other sedative agents * \- General anesthetic agents * Pregnancy * Severe hepatic impairment * Evidence of infection at or near the proposed needle insertion site * Any sensorimotor deficit, whether acute or chronic, as determined by the PI * Chronic use of opioid medication * BMI ≥ 35
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Coronary artery disease are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can pressing six points on the body help older adults sleep?
- Heart bypass surgeons test which vein layout keeps grafts open
- A soft patch that watches your heart beat in real time
- Can AI-Tailored heat warnings shield chronic disease patients from dangerous temperatures?
- Zapping the ear: a new way to stop Post-Surgery heart rhythm problems?
- Squeeze a ball, lower your blood pressure? heart trial puts handgrip exercise to the test