New breathing mode tested in tiny infants with severe lung condition
NCT ID NCT04821453
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study tested two different ways of using a breathing machine (ventilator) in 12 premature infants with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a serious lung condition. One mode, called NAVA, uses the baby's own diaphragm signals to trigger breaths, while the other, CMV, uses airflow. The goal was to see if NAVA improves oxygen levels and reduces the need for sedation. The trial was stopped early, so results are limited.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) mode of mechanical ventilation
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that NAVA is a better way to support breathing in infants with severe lung disease, potentially improving oxygen levels and reducing stress.
- What could go wrong
- This was a very small pilot study (12 infants) that was terminated early, so results are limited. It may not show a clear benefit over standard ventilation.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
12 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Sep 2021
- Finished
-
Feb 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Up to 24 months
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Gestational ages (GA) ≤ 32 weeks 2. Current age between 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) and 2 years corrected age 3. Severe BPD \[as per National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus definition\] diagnosed at 36 weeks postmenstrual age 4. Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for ongoing lung disease 5. Not expected to be ready for extubation within 11 days following enrollment 6. Parental consent Exclusion Criteria: 1. Severe congenital anomalies 2. Known diaphragmatic defect 3. Current treatment with high frequency mechanical ventilation 4. Do not resuscitate (DNR) Status or Futility of Care 5. \>10% leak around the artificial airway, 6. Treatment with neuromuscular blockade within 72 hours prior to enrollment 7. Acute respiratory instability defined as a ventilator rate increase \> 15 beats per minute (bpm), Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) increase \> 2 cm/water (H2O), sustained FiO2 increase \> 20%, and/or prescribed increase in tidal volume \> 2 mL/kg within 24 hours prior to enrollment will be excluded.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Bronchopulmonary dysplasia are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
-
Rhode Island Hospital (Hasboro Children's Hospital)
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Why do some preterm babies need breathing machines longer?
- Could letting patients breathe on their own sooner protect their lungs?
- Can tilting a Patient's body toward the infection help them breathe free sooner?
- The hidden breath: how a mismatch between patient and machine may shape ARDS recovery
- Can a bedside ultrasound predict which septic shock patients will stop breathing on their own?
- Could less food help critically ill patients recover faster?