Tooth infection treatment showdown: MTA vs. standard sealers
NCT ID NCT07653997
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested two different materials used in root canal treatment for teeth with both root and gum infections. 120 adults received either a mineral-based plug (MTA) or a standard resin sealer. Researchers measured healing and inflammation markers after one year to see which approach works better.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) and resin-based sealer (AH Plus)
- What this could lead to
- If MTA proves better, it could become the preferred material for treating complex tooth infections, improving healing and saving more teeth.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with 120 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The study only followed patients for one year, so long-term benefits are unknown.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
120 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Mar 2024
- Finished
-
Apr 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 60 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Aged between 18 and 60 years Systemically healthy individuals Presence of radiographically confirmed periapical lesion Diagnosis of apical periodontitis and/or combined endodontic-periodontal lesion Ability to understand and sign informed consent Willingness to attend follow-up visits Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with severe systemic diseases (ASA III-VI) Teeth with advanced mobility (Miller Class III or higher) Patients unable to tolerate dental treatment procedures Patients unwilling to participate or attend follow-up visits
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Apical periodontitis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can ancient frankincense Out-Clean the Dentist's standard root canal rinse?
- Can a new sealer make root canals less painful?
- A tiny file trick might make root canals less painful
- Can a laser beam ease pain after Root-End surgery?
- Root canal alternative? new procedure aims to save infected teeth
- Can a gentler root canal save more tooth and still heal infection?