New back joint could replace fusion surgery
NCT ID NCT05438719
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 30, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study tests a new device called MOTUS, which replaces a worn-out joint in the lower back with an artificial one. The goal is to see if it works as well as the standard surgery (spinal fusion) for reducing pain and improving function. About 158 adults aged 21-80 with single-level lumbar degeneration are taking part. The study measures pain, disability, and safety over time.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
158 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jun 2022
- Expected to finish
-
Jun 2029
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
21 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male or female, age 21-80 (inclusive) with at least 3 years of life expectancy; 2. The subject has a primary diagnosis of symptomatic lumbar degeneration with or without foraminal or recess stenosis of the lumbar spine at a single level from L1/L2 to L5/S1 confirmed by subject history and radiographic imaging (CT, MRI, X-rays) with no more than a Grade 1 (\<25% translation) spondylolisthesis. Symptomatic lumbar degeneration that may be associated with a co-morbid condition such as: 1. Herniated nucleus pulposus; 2. Scarring/thickening of the ligamentum flavum, annulus fibrosus, or facet joint capsule; 3. Facet joint degeneration/osteophyte formation; 4. Spondylosis (defined by the presence of osteophytes); 5. Disc degeneration and/or annular degeneration; and/or 6. Lumbar stenosis defined by spinal cord or nerve root compression; 3. Exhausted conservative treatment (e.g. bed rest, physical therapy, medications, TENS, manipulation, and/or spinal injections) for at least 3 months or has a neurologic emergency; 4. Preoperative Oswestry Disability Index score ≥ 40/100 at baseline; 5. Psychosocially, mentally, and physically able and willing to fully comply with this protocol including adhering to follow-up schedule and requirements and filling out forms; and 6. Signed informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. More than one vertebral level requiring treatment with instrumentation; 2. Previous instrumented surgery (i.e.: anterior disc replacement, spinal fusion, interspinous device, etc.) at the index lumbar level or an adjacent level; 3. Degenerative or lytic spondylolisthesis greater than Grade 1 (25% translation) associated with congenital (e.g. dysplastic) pars defects; 4. Rotatory scoliosis (\>10 degrees) at the index level; 5. Congenital bony and/or spinal cord abnormalities at the level to be treated such as conjoined nerve roots that would otherwise prevent placement of the device without generating nerve damage or skeletal malformations such as kyphotic vertebra that may be better suited for a different course of treatment (e.g. spinal fusion); 6. Subcaudal defect, disrupting the integrity of the pedicle that presents undue risk of device subsidence or migration due to compromised bone quality/density; 7. Clinically compromised vertebral bodies at the index level due to current or past trauma, e.g., by the radiographic appearance of the fracture callus, malunion or nonunion; 8. Disrupted anterior longitudinal ligament at the index level; 9. Overlying thoracolumbar kyphosis (greater than or equal to 15 degrees) within one level (includes target and adjacent level) of the level to be treated; 10. Back pain of unknown etiology without leg pain; 11. Severe spondylosis at the level to be treated as characterized by any of the following: 1. Autofusion (solid arthrodesis) determined radiographically (CT); 2. Totally collapsed disc, or; 3. Vertebral body that cannot be mobilized; 12. Known allergy to cobalt, chromium, molybdenum, nickel, polyethylene, titanium, or vitamin E; 13. Unable to undergo an MRI scan, CT scan or other radiograph assessments; 14. Osteopenia diagnosed by surgeon using a comprehensive assessment of all available information including the following: * DEXA bone density measured T-score ≤ -1: * Females age \<50 and males age \<55: The SCORE/MORES will be utilized to screen if a DEXA scan is indicated. If SCORE/MORES value ≥ 6, then a DEXA scan is required. * Females age ≥50 and all males age ≥55: DEXA scan is required. * If indicated for DEXA, an existing scan is allowed if completed within 6 months of subject surgery; * Opportunistic quantitative CT (Hounsfield Units): Measurement is encouraged as supplemental information to determine potential for osteopenia; * Intra-operative evaluation of bone quality to assess if there is a significant risk for implant subsidence; 15. Has history of any endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis (e.g.: Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, Ehler-Danlos syndrome, or osteogenesis imperfecta); 16. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; 17. Lactating, pregnant or interested in becoming pregnant in the next 3 years; 18. Active infection - systemic or local; 19. Any medical condition requiring treatment with any drug known to potentially interfere with bone/soft tissue healing or receiving radiation therapy that is expected to continue for the duration of the study; 20. Body Mass Index \> 40; 21. Recurrent history of deep vein thrombosis, symptoms of arterial insufficiency, or thromboembolic disease; 22. Systemic disease including Lupus disease, Reiter's disease, Rheumatoid disease, AIDS, HIV, hepatitis or autoimmune disease that requires immunosuppressive therapy, including biologics, for systemic inflammation; 23. Spinal tumor at the index level or adjacent level that could compromise integrity of the implant (hemangiomas must be evaluated by the investigator and determined to not be pathologic, for example a biopsy may be required; 24. Active malignancy: A patient with a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless he/she has been treated with curative intent and there have been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for at least 5 years; 25. Any degenerative muscular or neurological condition that would interfere with evaluation of outcomes, including but not limited to Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), or multiple sclerosis; 26. Has chronic or acute renal and/or hepatic impairment and/or failure or prior history of renal and/or hepatic parenchymal disease; 27. Has a Waddell Signs of Inorganic Behavior score of 3 or greater; 28. In the opinion of the investigator, the subject has a behavioral, cognitive, social or medical problem that may interfere with the assessment of the safety or effectiveness of the device; 29. Current or recent history of chemical/alcohol abuse or dependency using standard medical definition of DSM-5 code; 30. Currently smoking or using tobacco products, including e-cigarette products (e.g., vaping) (Use within 30 days of surgery date is considered 'current'); 31. Currently pursuing or in active spinal litigation for medical negligence, or trauma, or workers compensation; 32. Is a prisoner, incarcerated, or has been coerced to participate in the study that could impact the validity of results; 33. Is currently participating in an investigational therapy (device and/or pharmaceutical) within 30 days prior to entering the study or such treatment is planned during the 24 months following enrollment into the study.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Lumbar spine degeneration are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Center for Sports Medicine and Orthopaedics
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404, United States
-
Florida Orthopaedic Institute
Temple Terrace, Florida, 33637, United States
-
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
-
NYU Langone
New York, New York, 10016, United States
-
Oklahoma Spine Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73170, United States
-
Ortho San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
-
Pinehurst Surgical Clinic
Pinehurst, North Carolina, 28374, United States
-
Spine Institute of Louisiana
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101, United States
-
Spine and Orthopedic Center
Deerfield Beach, Florida, 33441, United States
-
Steamboat Orthopaedic & Spine Institute (SOSI)
Steamboat Springs, Colorado, 80487, United States
-
Strenge Spine Centert
Paducah, Kentucky, 42003, United States
-
The Disc Replacement Center
West Jordan, Utah, 84088, United States
-
Todd H. Lanman, MD Inc.
Los Angeles, California, 90210, United States
-
Upstate Orthopedics
East Syracuse, New York, 13057, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- New study follows patients after back fusion surgery to measure Real-World results
- Could ambien help you heal faster after back surgery?
- Are repeat back surgeries riskier? new study investigates
- New device aims to improve spinal fusion for back pain sufferers
- Texting your way to a better back surgery recovery?
- Ear needles for back pain? new study tests battlefield acupuncture