Hernia surgery showdown: 3 stitches vs 1 stitch for mesh fixation
NCT ID NCT06314152
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared using 3 points versus 1 point to fix a lightweight mesh during laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP) in 351 adults with a first-time inguinal hernia. The goal was to see which method leads to less pain, fewer complications like seroma or infection, and lower recurrence rates over 12 months. Results are based on follow-up exams and patient reports.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- lightweight mesh fixation procedure
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help surgeons choose a better method to reduce chronic pain and complications after hernia repair.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed study, but the results may not apply to all hernia types or surgical approaches. Individual outcomes can vary.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
351 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2023
- Finished
-
Oct 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Unilateral inguinal hernia according to preoperative physical examination and imaging examination. The inclusion criteria were as follows: primary inguinal hernia. Exclusion Criteria: * Age below 18 years or older than 80. recurrent hernia, incarcerated hernia, strangulated hernia, and other types of hernias. Patients not suitable for general anesthesia. Patients requiring open surgery; patients requiring emergency surgery Loss to follow-up or communication difficulties, or poor compliance.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Chronic pain are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Yunhong Tian
Nanchong, Sichuan, 637000, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can difficulty naming emotions shape how much tailbone pain you feel?
- Can talk therapy rewire the brain to ease burn Survivors' pain?
- Can a video game teach cancer patients to tame their pain?
- Could a wearable zapper quiet cirrhosis pain without drugs?
- Can ketamine boost mindfulness therapy for people facing pain and PTSD?
- Can virtual walking trick the brain into easing chronic pain?