Could a new drug beat the current standard for septic shock?
NCT ID NCT06746753
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jul 24, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tests whether a drug called Angiotensin II works better than the usual treatment (norepinephrine) for people with septic shock, a life-threatening condition where blood pressure drops dangerously. About 78 adults with septic shock will receive either Angiotensin II or standard care to see which helps restore blood pressure and improve survival. The goal is to find better ways to treat this serious illness and reduce its high death rate.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
About 78 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Sep 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Oct 2028
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: \- The presence of septic shock, defined by sepsis-3 criteria: 1-adult patients (18 years or older) with septic shock, defined by SEPSIS-3 criteria: a) suspected or known infection, b) hypotension requiring vasopressors, and c) lactate \>2mmol/L 2-receiving either norepinephrine or phenylephrine with or without additional vasopressor support 3- total norepinephrine equivalent dose (NED) ≥0.1 mcg/kg/min and ≤0.5 mcg/kg/min, to maintain a MAP of at least 65 mmHg, is required for randomization 4-ability to consent and randomize within 24 hrs of first reaching NED threshold and within 48 hrs of hospital arrival Exclusion Criteria: * Age \<18 years * Prisoners * Pregnant women * Patients for whom urgent surgery is anticipated * Leukocyte count \<1,000 cells/μL * Absolute monocyte count \<200 cells/μL * Bone marrow transplant within the past 30 days * Patients that will be withdrawing aggressive resuscitation, including withdraw of vasopressor support * transfer from outside ICU * history of liver cirrhosis with Child-Pugh score ≥6
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Septic shock are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
2 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
-
Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Chilling fever: can cooling septic shock patients save lives?
- Bedside eye scans may reveal hidden blood flow problems in septic shock
- Can two blood markers catch sepsis before it turns deadly?
- Two cheap blood ratios put to the test as sepsis death predictors
- Can a bedside ultrasound predict which septic shock patients will stop breathing on their own?
- Can a computer model speed up sepsis blood tests?