Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

10-Year study aims to find safer gastric bypass technique

NCT ID NCT04930029

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study follows 320 people who had omega gastric bypass surgery 10 years ago to compare long-term side effects between two surgical techniques (150 cm vs 200 cm loop). Researchers will check for serious complications, nutritional problems, and weight loss. The goal is to determine which method is safer over the long term.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Omega gastric bypass surgery (with 150 cm or 200 cm biliary limb)
What this could lead to
If successful, this study could help surgeons choose the safer type of omega gastric bypass, reducing long-term complications for people with obesity.
What could go wrong
This is an observational study, not a treatment trial, so it won't directly test a new therapy. Results may take years and might not apply to all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

About 320 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Sep 2021

Expected to finish

Jul 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

This study involves patients: * operated between 2008 and 2013 for an OAGB with a 150 or 200cm biliary limb * fulfilling the HAS criteria(HAS, 2009) at the time of their surgery: BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 or BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 associated with a comorbidity likely to be improved by weight loss * benefiting from a follow-up.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients who received 10 ± 2 years ago (between 2009 and 2013) an OAGB with a 150 or 200cm biliary limb. Patients should be consecutive at each center. * Patients fulfilling the criteria of indication for bariatric surgery at the time of their intervention according to the recommendations of the HAS (HAS, 2009) in an expert center. * Patients agreeing to perform an endoscopic evaluation with biopsies at 10 years * Patients who gave their consent * Patients with health insurance coverage Exclusion Criteria: * Contraindication to bariatric surgery defined according to HAS recommendations (HAS, 2009) * Persons deprived of liberty, under guardianship, or under curatorship * Patients included in a protocol with a conflict of interest with OMEGA10.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Bypass complication are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Hôpital Claude Huriez - Service de chirurgie générale et endocrinienne

    RECRUITING

    Lille, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.