Breathing treatment showdown: no clear winner in lung opening study
NCT ID NCT04664322
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at two breathing treatments—high-flow oxygen and non-invasive ventilation—in 16 adults with sudden breathing failure from pneumonia. The goal was to see which one better opens up the lungs. The results showed no major difference in lung opening, though non-invasive ventilation improved oxygen levels more. This helps doctors understand the pros and cons of each treatment.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
16 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Feb 2016
- Finished
-
Feb 2018
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Adults referred in ICU
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients referred in ICU * with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure due to a community acquired pneumonia confirmed by chest X ray, * with PaO2 \< 60mmHg in ambient air, without hypercapnia (PaCO2 \< 45 mmHg), * requiring more than 6L/min of O2 on admission with high concentration FM, and justifying HFNC or NIV for the attending ICU physician Exclusion Criteria: * cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, * moderate to severe underlying respiratory disease including COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) * contraindication to or failure of previous NIV or HFNC with the need for immediate invasive ventilation * pregnant or breast-feeding women * carrier of an implantable defibrillator or pacemaker * body mass index (BMI)\>50 kg/m2 * with cutaneous lesion next to the positioning zone of the Pulmovista® (Dräger, Lübeck, Germany) belt
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU de ROUEN
Rouen, 76031, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.