Breathing treatment showdown: no clear winner in lung opening study

NCT ID NCT04664322

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at two breathing treatments—high-flow oxygen and non-invasive ventilation—in 16 adults with sudden breathing failure from pneumonia. The goal was to see which one better opens up the lungs. The results showed no major difference in lung opening, though non-invasive ventilation improved oxygen levels more. This helps doctors understand the pros and cons of each treatment.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE WITH HYPOXIA are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • CHU de ROUEN

    Rouen, 76031, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.