Breathing treatment showdown: no clear winner in lung opening study
NCT ID NCT04664322
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at two breathing treatments—high-flow oxygen and non-invasive ventilation—in 16 adults with sudden breathing failure from pneumonia. The goal was to see which one better opens up the lungs. The results showed no major difference in lung opening, though non-invasive ventilation improved oxygen levels more. This helps doctors understand the pros and cons of each treatment.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE WITH HYPOXIA are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU de ROUEN
Rouen, 76031, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.