Breathing treatment showdown: no clear winner in lung opening study
NCT ID NCT04664322
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at two breathing treatments—high-flow oxygen and non-invasive ventilation—in 16 adults with sudden breathing failure from pneumonia. The goal was to see which one better opens up the lungs. The results showed no major difference in lung opening, though non-invasive ventilation improved oxygen levels more. This helps doctors understand the pros and cons of each treatment.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HYPOXEMIC ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
CHU de ROUEN
Rouen, 76031, France