Which breathing aid wins for lung clots? new trial aims to find out
NCT ID NCT07381712
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial compares two non-invasive breathing support methods—high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV)—in 100 adults with acute pulmonary embolism and respiratory failure. The goal is to see which method helps patients breathe on their own within 48 hours and improves survival. Participants must be stable enough to avoid immediate intubation.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) and Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) devices
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show which breathing support method works better for pulmonary embolism patients, potentially improving weaning success and survival.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 100 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. The study is not yet recruiting, and outcomes depend on individual patient factors.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
100 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Nov 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: \- 1. Age ≥18 y; presented with acute PE confirmed by CTPA or high-probability V/Q. 2\. AHRF needing non-invasive support; provided that patients able to protect airway and hemodynamically stable without escalating vasopressors Exclusion Criteria: * 1\. Immediate indication for intubation; high-risk (massive) PE with shock requiring advanced airway/vasopressors; active major bleeding; untreated pneumothorax. 2\. Contraindications/intolerance to assigned modality (e.g., facial trauma for NIV; complete nasal obstruction for HFNC). 3\. Do-Not-Intubate orders; pregnancy ; concomitant respiratory failure primarily due to another process requiring a different pathway.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Pulmonary embolism are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Assiut University Hospitals
Asyut, أسيوط - Asyut Governorate, 71511, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can electronic alerts and patient teaching stop deadly clots after cancer surgery?
- Can a new Five-Category system predict which pulmonary embolism patients will crash?
- A new exercise plan aims to get pulmonary embolism survivors back on their feet
- Spotting hidden blood clots in scarred lungs: a study hunts for clues
- Decades-Long study of 121,700 nurses aims to uncover hidden heart disease triggers
- Massive chest pain registry reveals gaps between guidelines and real-world care in china