New sedative may offer safer sleep for ICU patients
NCT ID NCT06261996
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested fospropofol against the standard sedative propofol in 200 adults on breathing machines in the ICU. Researchers measured how well each drug kept patients calm and tracked side effects like low blood pressure and injection pain. The goal was to see if fospropofol could be a safer or more effective option for sedation during mechanical ventilation.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- fospropofol
- What this could lead to
- If fospropofol proves safer or more effective than propofol, it could become a preferred sedative for ICU patients on breathing machines.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage study with only 200 participants. Results may not apply to all ICU patients, and side effects like low blood pressure or slow heart rate are possible with both drugs.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
200 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2024
- Finished
-
Jul 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 75 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Aged 18-75 years old 2. Intubation and mechanical ventilation \<12h before enrollment 3. Expected to require continuous invasive ventilation and sedation less than 6h after admission to anesthesia intensive care unit (AICU). 4. Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: 1. parturient, childbirth or lactating mothers 2. acute severe neurological disease or coma 3. chronic renal failure 4. previous mechanical ventilation \>12h 5. severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh score C) 6. BMI \>30kg/m2 (\>90kg) 7. dying
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Invasive mechanical ventilation are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
Zhengzhou, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Peer coaching may empower families of Ventilator-Dependent children
- Breathing trial showdown: which method helps ICU patients breathe on their own?
- Could a common nausea drug shield ARDS lungs from further harm?
- Too much oxygen in ICU linked to higher death risk
- Jaw tracking could spare ICU patients from invasive breathing tests
- Can a simple ultrasound predict breathing machine success in ICU pneumonia patients?