Which ultrasound test best guides fluid resuscitation in septic shock?
NCT ID NCT07550400
First seen May 08, 2026 · Last updated May 21, 2026 · Updated 4 times
Summary
This study compares two ultrasound techniques—heart ultrasound and carotid artery ultrasound—to see which better predicts whether a septic shock patient will benefit from additional fluids. About 40 adults with septic shock will be enrolled. The goal is to improve how doctors decide on fluid therapy, potentially reducing complications from too much or too little fluid.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SEPTIC SHOCK are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University
RECRUITINGCairo, Egypt
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.