Dental filling showdown: which technique keeps your fillings intact longer?
NCT ID NCT06183320
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested two ways of placing a flowable bulk fill composite in class II cavities (fillings between back teeth). 38 patients received two fillings each, one with the flowable composite exposed at the edge and one not. Researchers will check for restoration loss, staining, and other issues over 5 years to see which technique works better.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Flowable bulk fill composite (Opus Bulk Fill Flow APS) and incremental composite (Vittra APS)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show dentists the best technique for using flowable bulk fill composites in back tooth fillings, potentially making fillings last longer and reducing staining or loss.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 38 patients, so results may not apply to everyone. The study compares techniques, not a new treatment, so no major breakthrough is expected.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
38 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Aug 2019
- Finished
-
May 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 70 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Volunteers must have at only 20 teeth in function * Volunteers must have at only 2 carious proximo-occlusal lesions, or old restorations that need to be changed, in different teeth * These lesions must be more than 3 mm deep in the oclusal area and more than 5 mm deep in the proximal area, should have exposed dentin, and must have at only 50% of margins in enamel * Teeth should not present periodontal mobility Exclusion Criteria: * Volunteers with periodontal disease * Volunteers with gingival bleeding * Volunteers that have uses anti-inflammatory drugs in the last 30 days * Pregnant volunteers
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dental caries are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Universidade Federal Fluminense - School of Dentistry
Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, 28625-650, Brazil
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can natural mouthwashes fight cavity bacteria as well as chlorhexidine?
- Tooth pulp test may reveal which deep cavities heal without a root canal
- Can a bonding layer make Kids' cavity sealants last longer?
- Could popular Weight-Loss drugs quietly reshape your mouth?
- Can dentists patch a failing baby tooth instead of drilling it out?
- Can a squeezable filling match the standard for cavities?