Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Can a video call replace a hospital trip for ankle rehab?

NCT ID NCT07751107

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Aug 07, 2026 · Last updated Aug 07, 2026

Summary

This study explores how people feel about receiving physiotherapy by video call compared with face-to-face hospital appointments after surgery for a broken ankle. Around 30 adults who recently had ankle surgery will be randomly assigned to one of two groups, both following the same early rehabilitation programme but delivered differently. Participants will share their experiences through interviews and questionnaires, helping researchers understand whether virtual physiotherapy is acceptable and whether a larger study is worth pursuing.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Physiotherapy delivered via video call (EVAR) compared with face-to-face hospital appointments (EMADE)
What this could lead to
If video-call physiotherapy is acceptable and practical, it could offer a convenient alternative to hospital visits for early ankle rehabilitation, potentially shaping future care pathways.
What could go wrong
This is a small feasibility study, not a large trial, so results may not apply broadly. Some people may prefer or need in-person care, and technical issues could affect the experience.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 30 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Jul 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Sep 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Eligibility Criteria: Adults who have undergone ankle fracture surgery Inclusion Criteria: * Adults of either sex, aged 18 years and older, with no upper limit. * Within the last 21 days, they underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for an ankle fracture; AO44, AO43B and AO43C classifications and subclassifications. * Any orthopaedic weightbearing instructions, ranging from non-weightbearing to unrestricted weightbearing. Exclusion Criteria: * Unable or unwilling to give informed written consent for any reason. * Unable or unwilling to engage with the early ankle rehabilitation programme. * Severe open fractures (Gustilo Anderson G3) * A clinical decision was made that the ankle should remain cast immobilised until the subsequent orthopaedic review, which is beyond 21 days post-surgery. * If, in the opinion of the clinical and research staff, it is in the patient's best interest to be excluded due to presentations such as, but not limited to: * Soft tissue concerns where early movement may risk tissue breakdown. * Comorbidities associated with slowed tissue healing, such as non-healing leg/foot ulcers, medicating diabetics and a lack of protective distal sensation (e.g. peripheral neuropathy). * There is a plausible concern that the individual has been or will be non-compliant with the most recent treatment advice, for example, weightbearing contrary to orthopaedic advice. * Inability to adhere to study procedures, including, but not limited to, the following: * Lacking the capacity to adhere to the study intervention (minor assistance from family and friends is permissible). * Unable to converse fluently in English for the interviews or lack the capacity or ability to complete the study questionnaire in English. * Does not have access to and/or rudimentary capacity to use virtual clinic technology (assistance from family and friends is permissible). * Currently taking part or having taken part in a research study in the last 3 months that involves/involved invasive procedures. Where the circumstances of a potential participant are ambiguous, clarification with the CI or PI should be sought.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Ankle fracture are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Ankle Fractures Motor Activity

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Academic Orthopaedics and Trauma

    Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.