Can a video call replace a hospital trip for ankle rehab?
NCT ID NCT07751107
First seen Aug 07, 2026 · Last updated Aug 07, 2026
Summary
This study explores how people feel about receiving physiotherapy by video call compared with face-to-face hospital appointments after surgery for a broken ankle. Around 30 adults who recently had ankle surgery will be randomly assigned to one of two groups, both following the same early rehabilitation programme but delivered differently. Participants will share their experiences through interviews and questionnaires, helping researchers understand whether virtual physiotherapy is acceptable and whether a larger study is worth pursuing.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Physiotherapy delivered via video call (EVAR) compared with face-to-face hospital appointments (EMADE)
- What this could lead to
- If video-call physiotherapy is acceptable and practical, it could offer a convenient alternative to hospital visits for early ankle rehabilitation, potentially shaping future care pathways.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small feasibility study, not a large trial, so results may not apply broadly. Some people may prefer or need in-person care, and technical issues could affect the experience.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 30 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Jul 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Sep 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Eligibility Criteria: Adults who have undergone ankle fracture surgery Inclusion Criteria: * Adults of either sex, aged 18 years and older, with no upper limit. * Within the last 21 days, they underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for an ankle fracture; AO44, AO43B and AO43C classifications and subclassifications. * Any orthopaedic weightbearing instructions, ranging from non-weightbearing to unrestricted weightbearing. Exclusion Criteria: * Unable or unwilling to give informed written consent for any reason. * Unable or unwilling to engage with the early ankle rehabilitation programme. * Severe open fractures (Gustilo Anderson G3) * A clinical decision was made that the ankle should remain cast immobilised until the subsequent orthopaedic review, which is beyond 21 days post-surgery. * If, in the opinion of the clinical and research staff, it is in the patient's best interest to be excluded due to presentations such as, but not limited to: * Soft tissue concerns where early movement may risk tissue breakdown. * Comorbidities associated with slowed tissue healing, such as non-healing leg/foot ulcers, medicating diabetics and a lack of protective distal sensation (e.g. peripheral neuropathy). * There is a plausible concern that the individual has been or will be non-compliant with the most recent treatment advice, for example, weightbearing contrary to orthopaedic advice. * Inability to adhere to study procedures, including, but not limited to, the following: * Lacking the capacity to adhere to the study intervention (minor assistance from family and friends is permissible). * Unable to converse fluently in English for the interviews or lack the capacity or ability to complete the study questionnaire in English. * Does not have access to and/or rudimentary capacity to use virtual clinic technology (assistance from family and friends is permissible). * Currently taking part or having taken part in a research study in the last 3 months that involves/involved invasive procedures. Where the circumstances of a potential participant are ambiguous, clarification with the CI or PI should be sought.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Ankle fracture are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Academic Orthopaedics and Trauma
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.