Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

New study tests if Gum-Sparing dental implants preserve more bone

NCT ID NCT07663045

Disease control Sponsor: Gulf Medical University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two ways to place dental implants: the traditional method where the gum is cut open, and a newer flapless guided method that uses a 3D-printed guide to place the implant without cutting the gum. The goal is to see which approach better preserves the bone around the implant, causes less pain, and helps the gum heal faster. Ten adults who need at least two implants in the same jaw will each receive both types of implants (one of each) so the results can be directly compared.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
dental implant surgery (flapless guided vs. conventional flap)
What this could lead to
If flapless guided placement works better, it could become the preferred method for dental implants, leading to less pain and better long-term bone preservation.
What could go wrong
This is a very small early study with only 10 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The flapless technique may not always be suitable for complex cases.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

10 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jul 2025

Expected to finish

Jul 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

20 to 70 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 20 years or older. * Patients requiring at least two dental implants within the same arch. * Patients with good general health and able to undergo oral surgery. * Patients willing to participate in the study and provide informed consent. * Patients with adequate bone volume for implant placement as determined by preoperative radiographic assessment (e.g., cone beam computed tomography). Exclusion criteria: * Patients with systemic diseases that could compromise healing or implant success (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunocompromised conditions). * Patients with a history of radiation therapy to the head and neck region. * Patients with active periodontal disease or untreated oral infections. * Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding. * Patients with a history of bisphosphonate therapy or other medications that may affect bone metabolism. * Smoker Patients with a history of smoking or heavy alcohol consumption. * Patients with unrealistic expectations or inability to comply with postoperative care instructions. * Patients with significant facial trauma or anatomical deformities affecting the implant site. * Patient who requires Immediate implant placement * Thin gingival biotype

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CBCT segmentation are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

CBCT segmentation Delayed implant Guided implant placement

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Gulf Medical University

    Ajman, Ajman Emirate, 00000, United Arab Emirates

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.