New study tests if Gum-Sparing dental implants preserve more bone

NCT ID NCT07663045

Ongoing Disease control Sponsor: Gulf Medical University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two ways to place dental implants: the traditional method where the gum is cut open, and a newer flapless guided method that uses a 3D-printed guide to place the implant without cutting the gum. The goal is to see which approach better preserves the bone around the implant, causes less pain, and helps the gum heal faster. Ten adults who need at least two implants in the same jaw will each receive both types of implants (one of each) so the results can be directly compared.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: dental implant surgery (flapless guided vs. conventional flap)
What this could lead to: If flapless guided placement works better, it could become the preferred method for dental implants, leading to less pain and better long-term bone preservation.
What could go wrong: This is a very small early study with only 10 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The flapless technique may not always be suitable for complex cases.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CBCT SEGMENTATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

CBCT SEGMENTATION DELAYED IMPLANT GUIDED IMPLANT PLACEMENT

Contacts and locations

Locations

Gulf Medical University

Ajman, Ajman Emirate, 00000, United Arab Emirates

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.