Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Which CO2 test is best for emergency breathing tube checks?

NCT ID NCT06934876

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two methods—waveform capnography and a color-changing carbon dioxide detector—to see which more accurately confirms that a breathing tube is in the right place (the windpipe) in critically ill adults. About 2,000 patients in emergency departments or intensive care units will be enrolled. The goal is to find out which test is more sensitive and specific, helping doctors make safer decisions during intubation.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If this study succeeds, it could help doctors know which carbon dioxide test is more reliable for confirming breathing tube placement in emergency situations.
What could go wrong
This is an observational study comparing two existing tests, not testing a new treatment. Results may not apply to all patients or settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

About 2,092 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Apr 2025

Expected to finish

Jan 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Critically ill adult patients undergoing emergency intubation

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient is located in a participating unit (ED or ICU) 2. Patient is undergoing tracheal intubation. 3. The clinician intends to use an exhaled CO2 detection device to confirm tracheal placement of the tube. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient is known to be a prisoner 2. Patient is known to be \< 18 years old 3. A responsible clinician has determined that sole use of either waveform capnography or colorimetric testing is required for optimal care of the patient.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute respiratory failure are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    9 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Albany Medical Center

    RECRUITING

    Albany, New York, 12208, United States

  • Duke University School of Medicine

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

  • Hennepin Healthcare

    RECRUITING

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415, United States

  • Lahey Hospital & Medical Center

    RECRUITING

    Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States

  • Oregon Health and Sciences University

    RECRUITING

    Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

  • Regions Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101, United States

  • Rush University Medical Center

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States

  • The Ohio State University College of Medicine

    RECRUITING

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

  • Wake Forest School of Medicine

    RECRUITING

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.