Which biopsy method works best for abnormal bleeding?
NCT ID NCT07349108
First seen Jan 29, 2026 · Last updated May 21, 2026 · Updated 17 times
Summary
This study compared two ways to take a small tissue sample from the lining of the uterus in women aged 30 to 60 with abnormal uterine bleeding. The goal was to see which method—manual vacuum aspiration or dilatation and curettage—gives a better sample for diagnosing the cause of bleeding. The study involved 126 women and also measured pain after the procedure.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ABNORMAL UTERINE BLEEDING are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
Sheikh Zayed Medical college/hospital
Rahim Yar Khan, Punjab Province, 75000, Pakistan
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.