Could a simple CO2 test save lives in septic shock?
NCT ID NCT07179276
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two methods for guiding early treatment in people with septic shock, a severe infection that can cause organ failure. The standard approach uses blood lactate levels, but this trial tests whether using the CO2 gap (a measure of blood flow) is better at reducing deaths. About 750 adults in intensive care will take part, and the main goal is to see if more people survive at 28 days.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 750 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Mar 2026
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 18 years or older AND * Acutely admitted to a study ICU AND * Primary diagnosis of septic shock according to the Sepsis-3 criteria and defined as: * A suspected or documented site of infection or positive blood culture AND * Acute increase of at least 2 points in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score consequent to the infection AND * Having a serum lactate level \>2 mmol/l AND * Requirement of vasopressors (any dose of norepinephrine) to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥65 mmHg despite adequate fluid resuscitation (at least 1L of IV fluid in the last 24 hours prior to screening) Exclusion Criteria: * Septic shock for more than 12 hours at the time of screening * Primary cause of hypotension not due to sepsis (e.g., acute bleeding) * Decision not to resuscitate (or to limit full care) or not to intubate taken before obtaining consent * Death is deemed to be imminent or inevitable or patients with an underlying disease process with a life expectancy of less than 3 months * Anticipated surgery during the first 24 hours after randomization * Patient or their relatives' refusal to participate * Patients participating in another RCT with interventions possibly compromising the primary outcome * Prior enrollment in the CARBON trial * Known to be pregnant. * Legal protection (i.e., incompetence to provide consent and no guardian or incarceration) * No affiliation with the French health care system
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Sepsis - to reduce mortality in the intensive care unit are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
28 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
AP HM Hôpital la Timone
RECRUITINGMarseille, France
-
APHP Beaujon
RECRUITINGParis, France
-
APHP Bicêtre
RECRUITINGParis, France
-
APHP La pitié Salpêtrière - Anesthésie et soin intensif
RECRUITINGParis, France
-
APHP Lariboisière
RECRUITINGParis, France
-
CH Aurillac
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGAurillac, France
-
CH Le puy en Velay
RECRUITINGLe Puy-en-Velay, France
-
CH Moulins-Yzeure
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGMoulins, France
-
CH Vichy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGVichy, France
-
CH de la Côte Basque
RECRUITINGBayonne, France
-
CHRU Strasbourg - Service d'anesthésie-Réanimation médicale
RECRUITINGStrasbourg, France
-
CHU Bordeaux Hôpital Haut Lévèque
RECRUITINGBordeaux, France
-
CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin Hospital
RECRUITINGBordeaux, France
-
CHU Clermont-Ferrand Estaing
RECRUITINGClermont-Ferrand, France
-
CHU Clermont-Ferrand Gabriel Montpied
RECRUITINGClermont-Ferrand, France
-
CHU Dijon
RECRUITINGDijon, France
-
CHU Grenoble
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGGrenoble, France
-
CHU Montpellier
RECRUITINGMontpellier, France
-
CHU Nantes
RECRUITINGNantes, France
-
CHU Nîmes
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGNîmes, France
-
CHU Poitiers
RECRUITINGPoitiers, France
-
CHU Rennes
RECRUITINGRennes, France
-
CHU Strasbourg Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation chirurgicale
RECRUITINGStrasbourg, France
-
CHU la pitié slapêtrière - Anesthésie Réanimation
RECRUITINGParis, France
-
CHu Angers
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGAngers, France
-
Chu Toulouse
RECRUITINGToulouse, France
-
HCL - Lyon Sud
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGLyon, France
-
HCL Hôpital Edouard Herriot
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGLyon, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Bedside eye scans may reveal hidden blood flow problems in septic shock
- Can two blood markers catch sepsis before it turns deadly?
- Two cheap blood ratios put to the test as sepsis death predictors
- Can a bedside ultrasound predict which septic shock patients will stop breathing on their own?
- Can a computer model speed up sepsis blood tests?
- A routine calcium reading could reveal how sick a sepsis patient really is